On 21 Jan 2009, at 05:46, Kim Jones wrote:
OK. But keep in mind that consciousness is unique in the sense of
knowing that it cannot know its Turing emulability level (yet can
bet).
Footnote - (parenthetical digression): I know the above thought is
native to your schema, and up
On 21 Jan 2009, at 20:19, Mirek Dobsicek wrote:
My question has perhaps no sense at all. Is there a notion of quantum
computation done without any measurement?
Quantum lambda calculus by Andre van Tonder does not containt
measurement.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0307150v5
From the
On 21 Jan 2009, at 22:15, Kim Jones wrote:
On 22/01/2009, at 3:50 AM, Günther Greindl wrote:
Kim,
the uncomputability of this issue. Why should the mind be limited
to the
computable? Clearly it is not.
So you deny Step 1 again? You say no to the doctor?
In fact I have 'multiple
Bruno,
I found this an incredibly moving reply. I also see clearly your
points. I am glad to have given you an opportunity to state so clearly
some profoundly important ideas. Thank you, and let's continue the
voyage.
I am glad that Penrose was wrong. But then, without somebody as
4 matches
Mail list logo
