On Apr 21, 11:31 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
We could say that a state A access to a state B if there is a
universal machine (a universal number relation) transforming A into B.
This works at the ontological level, or for the third person point of
view. But if A is a
2009/4/22 Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com:
The question was whether information was enough, or whether something
else is needed for consciousness. I think that sequence is needed,
which we experience as the passage of time. When you speak of
computations going from A to B do you
Kelly wrote:
On Apr 21, 11:31 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
We could say that a state A access to a state B if there is a
universal machine (a universal number relation) transforming A into B.
This works at the ontological level, or for the third person point of
view. But if
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
2009/4/22 Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com:
The question was whether information was enough, or whether something
else is needed for consciousness. I think that sequence is needed,
which we experience as the passage of time. When you speak of
On 22 Apr 2009, at 08:55, Kelly wrote:
On Apr 21, 11:31 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
We could say that a state A access to a state B if there is a
universal machine (a universal number relation) transforming A into
B.
This works at the ontological level, or for the third
On 21 Apr 2009, at 20:33, Brent Meeker wrote:
I understand that the UD computes all different histories so they are
interleaved. But each particular computation consists of an ordered
set
of states. These states can belong to more than one sequence of
conscious experience. But the
John,
On 21 Apr 2009, at 21:30, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno,
you made my day when you wrote:
SOMEHOW - in:
...The machine has to be runned or executed relatively to a
universal machine. You need the Peano or Robinson axiom to define
such states and sequences of states.
You can shuffled
On Apr 21, 2:33 pm, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
These states can belong to more than one sequence of
conscious experience. But the question is whether the order of the
states in the computation is always the same as their order in any
sequence of conscious experience in which
Kelly wrote:
On Apr 21, 2:33 pm, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
These states can belong to more than one sequence of
conscious experience. But the question is whether the order of the
states in the computation is always the same as their order in any
sequence of conscious
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Kelly harmon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 21, 11:31 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
We could say that a state A access to a state B if there is a
universal machine (a universal number relation) transforming A into B.
This works at the ontological
10 matches
Mail list logo
