Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com
wrote:
In fact I used that same argument with Russell
Standish when he said that ants aren't conscious because if they were
then we should expect to be experiencing life as ants and not humans.
Did you
On Apr 27, 2:27 am, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
An untestable theory. But that's OK since if it's true it's also useless.
Ha! True, true. But it being true AND useless would have a certain
aesthetic/poetic appeal. Which makes me even more inclined to think
that this is the
Kelly,
Your position as you have described it sounds a lot like ASSA only
without taking measure into consideration. I am curious if you
believe there is any merit to counting OMs or not. Meaning, if I have
two computers and set them up to run simulations of the same mind, are
there two minds
2009/4/27 Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com:
I am not sure that the measure problem can be so easily
abandoned/ignored. Assuming every Observer Moment had has an equal
measure, then the random/white-noise filled OMs should vastly
outnumber the ordered and sensible OMs. Though I ever only
2009/4/28 Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com:
2009/4/27 Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com:
I am not sure that the measure problem can be so easily
abandoned/ignored. Assuming every Observer Moment had has an equal
measure, then the random/white-noise filled OMs should vastly
outnumber
Kelly wrote:
On Apr 27, 2:27 am, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
An untestable theory. But that's OK since if it's true it's also useless.
Ha! True, true. But it being true AND useless would have a certain
aesthetic/poetic appeal. Which makes me even more inclined
On 27 Apr 2009, at 06:40, Kelly wrote:
On Apr 26, 12:47 pm, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
No, I think you're missing my point. Consider your analogy of
fitting
together images to make a complete picture. You present this as a
spatial representation of the sequential
On 27 Apr 2009, at 07:24, Kelly wrote:
On Apr 26, 11:40 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
The question is; what are their relative probability measure? What
can
I expect.
Any expectations you have are unfounded. The problem of induction
applies.
There is no problem of
Kelly wrote:
On Apr 26, 12:47 pm, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
No, I think you're missing my point. Consider your analogy of fitting
together images to make a complete picture. You present this as a
spatial representation of the sequential flow of consciousness. Now
9 matches
Mail list logo
