On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> I may be absent for a period, for reason of sciatica.
> Best,
> Bruno
No worries! I will be a bit delayed on my response anyway. All is well!
Rex
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything
I'm sorry to hear that, Bruno. Hope you get well soon!
Charles
On Mar 4, 3:26 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> I may be absent for a period, for reason of sciatica.
>
> Best,
>
> Bruno
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On 3/3/2010 4:31 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Mar 2010, at 20:27, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/2/2010 10:09 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2010, at 20:29, Rex Allen wrote:
I don't have a problem with anti-realism about causal laws, since as
you say, my position boils down to "consciousne
I may be absent for a period, for reason of sciatica.
Best,
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe f
On 12 February 2010 03:14, Jack Mallah wrote:
> That's not true. For partial replacement scenarios, where part of a brain
> has counterfactuals and the rest doesn't, see my partial brain paper:
> http://cogprints.org/6321/
I've finally come around to reading this paper. You may or may not be
On 02 Mar 2010, at 20:33, Jack Mallah wrote:
I finally figured out what was happening to my emails: the spam
filter got overly agressive and it was sending some of the list
posts to the spam folder, but letting others into the inbox. The
post I'm replying to now was one that was hidden th
On 02 Mar 2010, at 20:27, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 3/2/2010 10:09 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2010, at 20:29, Rex Allen wrote:
I don't have a problem with anti-realism about causal laws, since as
you say, my position boils down to "consciousness is fundamental and
uncaused."
What doe
David,
It is the motivation of Everett to make coherent the wave equation and
the idea that mind is not something substantial acting on matter (like
Copenhagians are obliged to admit in a way or another).
To derive the phenomenology of the collapse, he used only "local
interactions" and loc
8 matches
Mail list logo
