On 24 May 2012, at 22:27, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
Reason is not nominating anyone by itself. I am doing the nominating
Are you doing the nominations for a reason? There are only two
possible answers.
Reasons don't care what I
On 24 May 2012, at 19:48, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/24/2012 6:42 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 May 2012, at 09:07, Russell Standish wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
To be sure I usually use - for the material implication, that is
a - b is indeed not a or
Einstein and Socratus.
=.
Einstein, you was mistaken using your Gravitation theory
to the all Universe as a whole.
The Gravitation theory doesn’t work in the Universe as a whole.
The Gravitation theory is a local theory.
Why?
Because the detected material mass of the matter in the
Universe (
On Thu, May 24, 2012 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
My doing the nomination is the reason for the reasons.
And the reason for the reasons that you nominated in the way you did had a
reason or it did not.
That doesn't necessarily mean that I wouldn't continue to enjoy free
http://uncomp.uwe.ac.uk/LCCOMP/en/Files/Entries/2012/5/23_A_Computable_Universe.html
Overview
This volume, with a foreword by Sir Roger Penrose, discusses the
foundations of computation in relation to nature.
It focuses on two main questions:
What is computation?
How does nature compute?
On 5/26/2012 1:50 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
http://uncomp.uwe.ac.uk/LCCOMP/en/Files/Entries/2012/5/23_A_Computable_Universe.html
Overview
This volume, with a foreword by Sir Roger Penrose, discusses the
foundations of computation in relation to nature.
It focuses on two main questions:
6 matches
Mail list logo
