Le 27-juil.-12, à 17:02, John Clark a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
You just evade the definition of free will that I gave to you,
You're going to need to be a lot more specific than that. I'd need
to use scientific notation to count the number of
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
You goal does not seem in discussing ideas, but in mocking people.
That is not true, my goal has two parts:
1) Figuring out what you mean by free will.
2) Figuring out if what you say about free will is true.
I have never completed
On 7/28/2012 9:35 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
This is a degeneracy problem, everything looks, acts and even is
one and the same thing, so how is there any differentiation that
allows a plurality to obtain?
0 ≠ s(0) ≠ s(s(0)) ≠
I need to explain myself on this claim for
John Ellis McTaggart
The Unreality of Time
Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 17 (1908): 456-473
I have learned about the McTaggart's A- and B-series from John Yates.
http://www.ifsgoa.com/
Now I have found the original paper by McTaggart in Internet:
On 7/28/2012 4:23 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
John Ellis McTaggart
The Unreality of Time
Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 17 (1908): 456-473
I have learned about the McTaggart's A- and B-series from John Yates.
http://www.ifsgoa.com/
Now I have found the original paper by
On 7/28/2012 9:46 AM, John Clark wrote:
It is relatively random in the first person perspective, like the first
person
indeterminacy,
So all you're saying is that in this thing you like to call first person indeterminacy
the outcome of the simple multiplication problem 74* 836 is
Dear Bruno,
From http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/awodey/preprints/fold.pdf
First-Order Logical Duality
we read:
In the propositional case, one passes from a propositional theory to a
Boolean algebra by
constructing the Lindenbaum-Tarski algebra of the theory, a construction
which identifies
7 matches
Mail list logo
