I thought the gravitational waves were generated as the black holes rotated
around one another, not (merely) as a consequence of the collision. Also,
what kinds of interactions transfer the energy/mass of the black holes
themselves into gravitational waves? I wasn't aware that any energy was
Thanks John, interesting. Does current theory make any predictions on how
much energy (electro-magnetic and otherwise) actually is produced during
ring-down, despite the inability to observe it due to the event horizon?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:37 AM, John Clark wrote:
>
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Terren Suydam
wrote:
>
> I thought the gravitational waves were generated as the black holes
> rotated around one another, not (merely) as a consequence of the collision.
> Also, what kinds of interactions transfer the energy/mass of
Yeah, I know, but I was wondering if because we are all about photons,
earth-life, etc; I wondered if we will find interesting things that don't show
up photometrically, visible light, ultraviolet, infrared, xrays, gamma rays.
Like a magic gravity telescope that would see something out there in
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Terren Suydam
wrote:
>
> If you were in one of the galaxies involved with the colliding black
> holes, would you be close enough to the gravitational waves to feel them on
> any kind of macroscopic level such as the one we inhabit?
>
Two massive bodies orbit one another - the interaction is
gravitational. As their positions change, the gravitational field due
to their mass-energy must change. But it can't change instantaneously
at distant points; the change propagates outward at the speed of light.
This is a wave in the
Sure, but John said the black holes lost 3 solar masses, which was
converted into gravitational waves... how? Fusion and fission are easy
examples of mass to energy conversion - so what's the specific interaction
here according to theory?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Brent Meeker
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Terren Suydam
wrote:
>
> Thanks John, interesting. Does current theory make any predictions on how
> much energy (electro-magnetic and otherwise) actually is produced during
> ring-down, despite the inability to observe it due to the
If you were in one of the galaxies involved with the colliding black holes,
would you be close enough to the gravitational waves to feel them on any
kind of macroscopic level such as the one we inhabit?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:12 PM, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 12,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:25 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I know, but I was wondering if because we are all about photons,
> earth-life, etc; I wondered if we will find interesting things that don't
> show up photometrically, visible
I also wonder how long it will take to develop refined gravity detectors and
what this would uncover? If it takes centuries, wake me up when its over. I
know we have detected neutrinos for decades, and I don't think any fundamental
changes in cosmology has occured? Its always the sizzle of the
The interaction is gravitational. The first experimental evidence for
gravitational waves was the correct derivation of the observed orbital
decay of a double star due to energy radiated as gravitational waves.
Brent
On 2/12/2016 4:57 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
I thought the gravitational waves
12 matches
Mail list logo