Re: A profound lack of profundity

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: ​> ​ > We obviously agree. The man in Moscow will not believe that "you will see > Moscow and noting else" would have been correct. He knows already that this > would be reftuted by the man in Washington, and, as a

Re: My model, comp, and the Second Law

Hi Hal, Welcome back. Unfortunately I have been very ill for the last 15 months or so. I am working on this project again and hope to post soon. Note that when something is not computable, it rarely makes a machine stop. It makes it not stopping. When a machine stop, its non

Re: A profound lack of profundity

On 07 Aug 2017, at 18:34, John Clark wrote: On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: ​> ​Nobody expect one answer , but everybody can see that BOTH agrees having one obtained one answer, ​Hmm ...does the Moscow man really believe the correct answer to