On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:24 PM, John Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Terren Suydam
> wrote:
>
> >
>> What's an example of a mind that *is* a system of parts working together?
>>
>
> My brain.
>
I'm a little surprised I need to
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Terren Suydam
wrote:
>
> What's an example of a mind that *is* a system of parts working together?
>
My brain.
John K Clark
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List"
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 Terren Suydam wrote:
>
>
>> >>
>>> I did not asked for a goddam theory, I asked for an example, an
>>> example of a mind that does not involve a system of parts working
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 Terren Suydam wrote:
> >>
>> I did not asked for a goddam theory, I asked for an example, an example
>> of a mind that does not involve a system of parts working together. And you
>> can provide no such example because none exists.
>>
>
> >
>
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> John, just tell us what a computationalist can expect to live from the
> first person pov when undergoing a duplication.
>
Bruno, I can expect nothing from gibberish until you tell me what my "*THE*
first person
On 10/9/2017 6:29 AM, David Nyman wrote:
On 5 October 2017 at 16:06, Bruno Marchal > wrote:
On 05 Oct 2017, at 16:02, David Nyman wrote:
On 5 October 2017 at 13:50, Bruno Marchal > wrote:
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 1:28 PM, John Clark wrote:
> I did not asked for a goddam theory, I asked for an example, an example
> of a mind that does not involve a system of parts working together. And you
> can provide no such example because none exists.
>
>
How do you know?
On 9 October 2017 at 16:12, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 09 Oct 2017, at 15:29, David Nyman wrote:
>
> On 5 October 2017 at 16:06, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>>
>> On 05 Oct 2017, at 16:02, David Nyman wrote:
>>
>> On 5 October 2017 at 13:50, Bruno Marchal
On 09 Oct 2017, at 15:29, David Nyman wrote:
On 5 October 2017 at 16:06, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Oct 2017, at 16:02, David Nyman wrote:
On 5 October 2017 at 13:50, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Oct 2017, at 15:07, David Nyman wrote:
On 2 Oct 2017
Spoiler alert: John will not answer this question directly. Instead we
will play with words and/or insult you. He will most definitely not
consider the experience from the first person, or even acknowledge
that such a thing is possible -- even though he has never experienced
reality from any other
On 5 October 2017 at 16:06, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 05 Oct 2017, at 16:02, David Nyman wrote:
>
> On 5 October 2017 at 13:50, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>>
>> On 02 Oct 2017, at 15:07, David Nyman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2 Oct 2017 1:58 p.m., "Bruno Marchal"
John, just tell us what a computationalist can expect to live from the
first person pov when undergoing a duplication. Below are only
distracting play-words.
Bruno
On 08 Oct 2017, at 19:28, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
12 matches
Mail list logo