On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 7:55:57 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/26/2018 1:03 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 2:33:13 PM UTC-5, Tomas Pales wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 8:06:03 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> OK. But it
On 10/26/2018 1:14 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 10:03:07 PM UTC+2, Philip Thrift wrote:
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 2:33:13 PM UTC-5, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 8:06:03 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
OK
On 10/26/2018 1:03 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 2:33:13 PM UTC-5, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 8:06:03 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
OK. But it seemed to me you said that is better not to make
unnecessary assumption.
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 11:59:28 PM UTC+2, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
> As a practical matter though, AI and agent programmers have to deal with
> inconsistent information in the world:
>
> https://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/632319/
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.02851
> https://www.s
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 3:14:05 PM UTC-5, Tomas Pales wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 10:03:07 PM UTC+2, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 2:33:13 PM UTC-5, Tomas Pales wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 8:06:03 PM UTC+2, Bruno
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 7:36:15 PM UTC, Tomas Pales wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 8:25:30 PM UTC+2, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 9:32:04 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 1:0
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 10:03:07 PM UTC+2, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 2:33:13 PM UTC-5, Tomas Pales wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 8:06:03 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> OK. But it seemed to me you said that is better not to m
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 2:33:13 PM UTC-5, Tomas Pales wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 8:06:03 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> OK. But it seemed to me you said that is better not to make unnecessary
>> assumption.
>>
>
> My only ontological assumption is that existenc
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 8:25:30 PM UTC+2, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 9:32:04 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 1:02:36 AM UTC, kujawski...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello I think this good forum fo
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 8:06:03 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> OK. But it seemed to me you said that is better not to make unnecessary
> assumption.
>
My only ontological assumption is that existence is logical consistency.
This assumption gives rise to the set-theoretic multivers
On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 9:32:04 AM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 1:02:36 AM UTC, kujawski...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about
>> Mathematical Universe, there are very big arguments
Hi Tomas,
> as I see it, my ontology, whose relational aspect is defined by the relation
> of similarity (and its special kinds - instantiation and composition),
> includes your ontology, because pure set theory includes arithmetic.
OK. But it seemed to me you said that is better not to make
Just a typo error correction I hope you have spotted it
> On 24 Oct 2018, at 18:45, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Thomas Pavel wanted that something is identical to itself. In most formal
> combinator theory x = x is given as an axiom, yet I did not take it.
> Likewise, the rule: if x = y then y
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:36 PM Philip Thrift
wrote:
*>"2+2=4" is only true in the sense that there is a language that has been
> created in which that sentence is labeled "true".*
If there were not at least 2 physical things in existence it would be
labeled neither true or false but gibberish
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 9:50:13 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 25 Oct 2018, at 18:36, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, October 25, 2018 at 11:03:22 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> There was no physics before writing, also; but there was a physical
>> real
> On 25 Oct 2018, at 20:05, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/25/2018 9:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> On 24 Oct 2018, at 03:22, Brent Meeker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/23/2018 9:23 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 23 Oct 2018, at 04:30, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 25 Oct 2018, at 19:46, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/25/2018 9:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> Now, when you say that there was no mathematics before writing, I am not
>> sure. I think the incas have developed ways to compute (notably the position
>> of the star in the sky) before w
> On 25 Oct 2018, at 18:36, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, October 25, 2018 at 11:03:22 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> There was no physics before writing, also; but there was a physical reality
> and a mathematical reality before human writing, and before humans, although
On Friday, October 26, 2018 at 10:39:27 AM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Thursday, October 25, 2018 at 10:12:42 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 10:39:11 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> If a system is in a superposition of st
On Thursday, October 25, 2018 at 10:12:42 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 10:39:11 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> If a system is in a superposition of states, whatever value measured,
>> will be repeated if the same system is repeatedly me
20 matches
Mail list logo
