Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2011-09-25 Thread Roger Granet
Bruno,     Hi.   >Roger:  When you say "Mathematical truth is in the mind of persons", this was >the very point I was making.  I don't >think there can exist mathematical >truths in some platonic realm somewhere.  They're in the mind, which is a >physical >thing, >This is something you assume

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2011-09-24 Thread Roger Granet
Jason,      >Do you believe there exist an infinite number of integers?  If so I ask you >why should these very large numbers exist if >they require a physical basis?   >There are numbers we cannot physically coceive of by virtue of their size and >the finite >size of the observable universe.  If

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2011-09-23 Thread Roger Granet
Bruno,     Hi.  My responses are: >Mathematical truth is in the mind of persons. And assuming we are machine, >mathematical truth is in the mind >of numbers relatively to numbers. Of course >we have to assume all elementary arithmetical truth, like "17 is >you doubt them? Roger:  When you say

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2011-09-22 Thread Roger Granet
is zero, just as it is of the >>> Nothing. The simplest set is the set of all possibilities, which is >>> the dual of the empty set." (pg. 40) He also suggests that Feynman >>> acknowledged something like Ontological Nihilism. In vol. 2 of his >>> lectures, Feynmann argued that the grand unified theory of physics >>> could be expressed as a functi

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2011-09-21 Thread Roger Granet
Everyone,     Hi.  My comments on all of today's comments   on this thread are below: o In regard to Jon's below comment: >Pearce later concludes that "if, in all, there is 0, i.e no (net) >>properties whatsoever, then there just isn't anything substantive >>which needs explaining."  Jason and Ro

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2011-08-10 Thread Roger Granet
Hi.  I used to post to this list but haven't in a long time.  I'm >>> > a biochemist but like to think about the question of "Why is there >>> > something rath

Re: No(-)Justification Justifies The Everything Ensemble

2007-09-12 Thread Roger Granet
If anyone is interested, I think some of the ideas at my website, www.geocities.com/roger846, apply to the current discussion. Briefly, the ideas entail: o Something exists because it is completely defined. That is, you know exactly what's contained in that thing. This applies to material

Why is there something rather than nothing?

2006-03-06 Thread Roger Granet
; conceptions of something from the thing itself. They're two different things. If you've read this far, I appreciate your listening! Those are my crazy ideas. If you're interested, more thinking on this and other topics is at my website, at www.geoci