Consiousness and particular states of mind are not reducible to states of
brain, they are patterns of brain activity, something abstract, relational.
I guess same thing is with matter. I read that it is specyficable in purly
relational terma.
Great topic btw :-)
--
You received this message
Thank you Lawrence for your clarification, but is it possibile that taoist
mistics had some intuitive glimpse of that reality described by quantum theory?
Maybe this od the case?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To
Thank you, very interesting response. I don't know if she was after Capra, she
have pointed me to Shantena Augusto Sabbadini
https://youtu.be/YcKbpMIelMo
0:00 - 27:00 - part is introduction to double slit experiment
27:30 he start relating physics to words of Laozi
--
You received this
My friend is not physicist I think she understand physics on popular-science
level same as me. Few days ago she told me that contemporary physics show
something about what ancient taoists sages was talking - Tao - unnamed,
undivided reality. I was not able to argue with her becourse of my low
Agrays:
>
> I don't see how Bruno answered your question when he misstated and doesn't
> understand the MUH. Yet you thank him and not me. AG
>
No, I thanked everybody in this topic in my earlier message, and here I
thanked Bruno not for answer about MUH but about Gerald Edelman movie.
Bruno Marchal thank you for your anwser.
Physicist Paul Benioff make interesting idea
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0201093
that mathematics and laws of physics coemerged somehow randomly.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
Thank you everybody for your responses.
Bruno Marchal I looked at your statement, they are very interesting but
some very good neruoscientists argue that brain is not like computer
Here for example (4min video) Edelman:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmyfQY4TaVc
Please give me your thought
Thank you everybody for your responses. O Lord discussion go very
technical, maybe I'm too uneducated for questions like that, but at least I
have some glimpses on intuitive level.
Bruno Marchal I looked at your statement, they are very interesting but
some very good neruoscientists argue that
Hello I think this good forum for this topic - what do you think about
Mathematical Universe, there are very big arguments for that hypothesis:
- applicability of mathematic, to natural sciences
- all we discovere are structures and I didnt find explanation of the
diference beetwen physical
9 matches
Mail list logo
