On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 4:52:11 AM UTC+1 meeke...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On 2/27/2022 4:44 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 11:45:32 PM UTC+1 meeke...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/2022 12:59 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, February 27,
On 2/27/2022 4:44 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 11:45:32 PM UTC+1 meeke...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2/27/2022 12:59 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 8:50:02 PM UTC+1
meeke...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/27/2022 8:43 AM, Tomas
On 2/27/2022 4:18 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 11:38:00 PM UTC+1 meeke...@gmail.com
wrote:
How could a set of things produce contradictions. Contradiction is
a relation of propositions, not things. I'm surprised that you a
strong advocate of examples
On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 11:45:32 PM UTC+1 meeke...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On 2/27/2022 12:59 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 8:50:02 PM UTC+1 meeke...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/2022 8:43 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday, February 24, 2022
On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 11:38:00 PM UTC+1 meeke...@gmail.com wrote:
> How could a set of things produce contradictions. Contradiction is a
> relation of propositions, not things. I'm surprised that you a strong
> advocate of examples over definitions would not have noticed that
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 5:38 PM Brent Meeker wrote:
>> I would say a useful definition of "possible" is the set of things or
>> relationships that do not produce contradictions.
>
>
>
>
> * How could a set of things produce contradictions. Contradiction is a
> relation of propositions, not
On 2/27/2022 12:59 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 8:50:02 PM UTC+1 meeke...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/27/2022 8:43 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 4:45:11 AM UTC+1
meeke...@gmail.com wrote:
This should be of interest to
On 2/27/2022 12:52 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 2:50 PM Brent Meeker
wrote:
/<"Possible" is a rather ill defined concept and "everything
possible" is even worse. /
I would say a useful definition of "possible" is the set of things or
relationships that do not
On Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 8:50:02 PM UTC+1 meeke...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On 2/27/2022 8:43 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
>
> On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 4:45:11 AM UTC+1 meeke...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>> This should be of interest to all the everythingists on this list. I'd
>>
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 2:50 PM Brent Meeker wrote:
*<"Possible" is a rather ill defined concept and "everything possible" is
> even worse. *
I would say a useful definition of "possible" is the set of things or
relationships that do not produce contradictions. I would also say it's
easier to
On 2/27/2022 8:43 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 4:45:11 AM UTC+1 meeke...@gmail.com
wrote:
This should be of interest to all the everythingists on this
list. I'd especially like to hear what Bruno thinks of it. It's
a bit expensive, so I may wait for
On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 4:45:11 AM UTC+1 meeke...@gmail.com wrote:
> This should be of interest to all the everythingists on this list. I'd
> especially like to hear what Bruno thinks of it. It's a bit expensive, so
> I may wait for more reviews before I take it up.
>
>
My view is that knowing how the Nobel committee does science awards that
Wheeler, or how the committee knifed Fred Hoyle's work on CNO physics is
another reason for outsiders to de-rate the Nobel's celebrity. Harumph, as we
chide in the hinterlands.
-Original Message-
From: Brent
Wheeler never got a Nobel.
I got a reply from Wilson essentially saying he's not interested the
deriving QM from anything, he regards it as fundamental and is seeking
to "rebuild the world as we know it from there".
Brent
On 2/24/2022 6:16 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Lewis's Modal realism
Lewis's Modal realism is just different verbiage for (as the bibliography on
the article) a more rigorous analysis started by High Everett, and its further
work by Bryce DeWitt & and nobelist, John Archibald Wheeler. Until someone
figures out how to view our world splitting off, or see's some
601 - 615 of 615 matches
Mail list logo
