On 20 Sep., 04:04, Russell Standish wrote:
The way I use the term, the ASSA just refers to use a global measure
for answering the question What is my next OM experienced. For other
questions using a global measure over OMs, the original term SSSA
(strong SSA) should be used. I'm aware of a
On 18/09/2007, Youness Ayaita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What remains unclear in this definition is the term reference class
which is also the source of the ASSA/RSSA debate. When we want to know
which observer moment to expect next, we look at the class of all
observer moments provided with a
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:48:58AM -0700, Youness Ayaita wrote:
So, I don't see any need for some kind of fundamental measure for
observer moments. Whenever we have a restriction defining a subclass
of observer moments that are of interest, we are naturally driven to
the RSSA and to a
When Bruno spoke of the ASSA I looked up some messages in this list
dealing with the ASSA and RSSA. My message does not aim at initiating
yet another controversial discussion of the subject. But I rather hope
that you will assist me resolving a misunderstanding.
Searching for the self-sampling
4 matches
Mail list logo
