Thanks Brent. It looks interesting indeed. Glad to see the frequency
operator coming back.
Tegmark is decidedly the closer physicist to the possible physics
which has to be extracted from the computationalist hypothesis. It is
sad that he is not ware of the delicacy of the mind-body problem
It is the nth attempt by Kent to refute Everett. Ah, but he may
succeed, one day.
Thanks for the link. I will try to find some time to take a look.
But personally I think that many-worlds is already a consequence of
mechanism, well before quantum mechanism. In that sense I think that
On 8/29/2010 11:49 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
It is the nth attempt by Kent to refute Everett. Ah, but he may
succeed, one day.
Thanks for the link. I will try to find some time to take a look.
But personally I think that many-worlds is already a consequence of
mechanism, well before quantum
3 matches
Mail list logo
