RE: FIN Again (was: Re: James Higgo)

2001-09-11 Thread Charles Goodwin
-Original Message- From: Jacques Mallah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I've explained that in other posts, but as you see, the idea is indeed mathematically incoherent - unless you just mean the conditional effective probability which a measure distribution defines by

Re: FIN Again (was: Re: James Higgo)

2001-08-30 Thread Jacques Mallah
From: Jesse Mazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't understand your objection. It seems to me that it is perfectly coherent to imagine a TOE which includes both a universal objective measure on the set of all observer-moments and also a relative conditional probability which tells me what the

Re: FIN Again (was: Re: James Higgo)

2001-08-29 Thread Jacques Mallah
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jacques Mallah writes: The problem comes when some people consider death in this context. I'll try to explain the insane view on this, but since I am not myself insane I will probably not do so to the satisfaction of those that are. I have mixed feelings about