On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> The problem is that we get only one qubit, and we still lack a tensor
> product, but there are reason to expect them from other variants: the
> graded one given by []^n p & <>^m t & p. But this can works only if they
> obeys some relatio
om
Subject: Re: S=0
On 5 Jan 2015, at 6:13 pm, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List > wrote:
For me the crux has always also been how does anything at all
emerge from an all-encompassing universal nothingness.
Well, you've read Larry Krauss on this by now for the Arist
On Monday, January 5, 2015 7:13:54 AM UTC, cdemorsella wrote:
>
> Russell ~ nicely summed up [is there a pun in what I just said?] I like
> that subtle meta information that the sum entirety of all information of
> everything is all on the left hand of an equation with no information in it
> a
"Nothing doing" might sum up what's going on.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this gr
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kim Jones
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 12:25 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: S=0
> On 5 Jan 2015, at 6:13 pm, 'Chris de Morsella' via Ev
> On 5 Jan 2015, at 6:13 pm, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
> wrote:
>
> For me the crux has always also been how does anything at all emerge from an
> all-encompassing universal nothingness.
Well, you've read Larry Krauss on this by now for the Aristotelian theologic
good oil. Lar
Russell ~ nicely summed up [is there a pun in what I just said?] I like that
subtle meta information that the sum entirety of all information of everything
is all on the left hand of an equation with no information in it at all when
taken as a whole. I like the focus that this way of putting it
7 matches
Mail list logo
