Le 05-août-05, à 14:44, Kim Jones a écrit :
On 04/08/2005, at 11:44 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 31-juil.-05, à 03:13, Kim Jones wrote (just before the thread was
censored).
Go Bruno!!
I will. Thanks to your post I realize that a possible quite huge
misunderstanding here could
Le 05-août-05, à 17:50, chris peck a écrit :
Bruno wrote:
Futhermore, with regards to formal logic, there is some controversy
over how logical operators should be interpreted I gather.
Yes and no. Because their job consists in making mathematical the
interpretations, and then to study
Le 04-août-05, à 18:11, chris peck a écrit :
Bruno wrote:
No. But then your definition of theology is perhaps a little bit to
much a contingent matter.
Perhaps the word theology has too many connotations.
I agree largely.
I think the correct distinction to make between what people seem
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Theology (was in-between-times) Date: 5 August 2005 10:44:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], everything-list@eskimo.comOn 04/08/2005, at 11:44 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:Le 31-juil.-05, à 03:13, Kim Jones
of enquiring.
How much did relative space/time as concept cost compared to the non
descovery of the Higgs Boson?
Regards Chris.
From: Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: chris peck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Theology (was in-between-times)
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005
Bruno wrote:
No. But then your definition of theology is perhaps a little bit to much a
contingent matter.
Perhaps the word theology has too many connotations.
I agree largely.
I think the correct distinction to make between what people seem to mean wrt
the religion/science dispute is
6 matches
Mail list logo
