Re: Re: Two "Leibnizian" proofs that God has the power of self-reference

2012-09-06 Thread Richard Ruquist
plies to the supreme monad. > > Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net > 9/6/2012 > Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him > so that everything could function." > > - Receiving the following content - > From: Stephen P. King >

Re: Re: Two "Leibnizian" proofs that God has the power of self-reference

2012-09-06 Thread Roger Clough
ng Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-09-06, 07:35:30 Subject: Re: Two "Leibnizian" proofs that God has the power of self-reference Dear Richard, Would it be a heresy to consider that God could have partial but not complete self-reference? On 9/6/2012 7:24 AM, Richard Ruquist wro

Re: Two "Leibnizian" proofs that God has the power of self-reference

2012-09-06 Thread Stephen P. King
Dear Richard, Would it be a heresy to consider that God could have partial but not complete self-reference? On 9/6/2012 7:24 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote: The Roman Catholic Church believes that god has intention but not intelligence in agreement with Arithemetical Truth and neo-Platonism co

Re: Two "Leibnizian" proofs that God has the power of self-reference

2012-09-06 Thread Richard Ruquist
The Roman Catholic Church believes that god has intention but not intelligence in agreement with Arithemetical Truth and neo-Platonism concept that self-reference is not possible for god. On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Roger Clough wrote: > > Since Leibniz's metaphysics is perfectly logical, any