James Higgo wrote:
> ...
>All that exists of 'you' is this very current thought. Whle
>'the measure of some objective George Levy' is meaningless, 'the measure of
>this thought' is a vaild concept; I'm not sure what you can do to increase
>or decrease that. An interesting area is the categorisati
An aside for Nick Bostrom:
I belive we must apply anthropic reasoning not to people - they don't exist
objectively - but to thoughts.
An interesting point is that all thoughts about anthropic reasoning include
something along the lines of , 'this is a thought about anthropic
reasoning'. Why is
2 matches
Mail list logo
