Hi, I´m new here. Please accept this source of extra noise in your
mailbox in the hope to be useful
Federico Marulli wrote:
So we can try to reason upon some examples which has a meaning from a
physical point of view. For instance, we can think about the second
principle of thermodynamics,
Some of these questions may be profound, and some silly. (In fact, they
may be sorted in order of profound to silly.) My education is spotty
in these areas. I'm most interested in specific references that help
answer (or destroy)
these questions.
1. What test could determine if a computational
he devil is watching you I put a curse on all of you that bad thing
will happen to you
and your love ones you may die to bad keep on sending me these email
and the
curse will get stronger so get fucked
Brent Meeker wrote:
Even the probability of observing a single large scale violation of the laws of probability is vanishingly small.
According to *our* laws of probability, that is.
But how can you make recourse to our laws of probability if there
are infinitely many universes which have
Greetings list members. This is my joining post.
Recent headlines indicate that there is empirical evidence now that
our known universe is about 13 billion years old, it is essentially
flat, and that space/time continues to be inflationary (we are in a
continuing big bang state) after
Could someone please send to the list and/or this lunatic the instructions
for unsubscribing from the list. My old machine's disk crashed taking my
email
archive with it so I don't have the removal instructions.
Thanks
Eric
Frank Flynn wrote:
the devil is watching you I put a curse on all of
Dear Mr? Mrs Frank:
Please if you are not interested get out
the list.
If you need maddly anal sex go to the nearest harbour and the boys out there
will give you 10 inch of hard meet.
I hope that you enjoy that fuxxstastic experience.
---
Outgoing mail is
Dear Russel
Do you have any comment to this comment by Deutsch on another list about
these matters?
Regards
Lennart
- Original Message -
From: David Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: The Turing Principle and the SSA
On
David Deutsch wrote about the Self Selection Assumption, on the
Fabric-of-Reality list:
One problem with both of these is that there is no preferred meaning to
sampling *randomly* from an infinite set, except in certain very
special cases.
A discrete infinity of copies of me is not one of
I unsubscribed for the FOR list about 6 months ago, as I found I could
no longer put up with the dross on that list (not that DD is dross, of
course!).
I must admit, I'm not entirely sure what problem DD is alluding to
here. In order to apply the SSA requires a measure on the reference
class.
I think a related point is touched on in my paper Complexity and
Emergence, as in Why Occam's razor. In both of these cases, one is
selecting from an infinite discrete set (of descriptions), which have
a uniform measure associated with them.
The answer you get, is the the probability of selection
It's a chatterbot. Considering the poor syntax and misspelled words, it was
probably designed by a Russian teen.
RMiller
Thank you list for the welcome. I look forward to many congenial
debates!
On 2 Nov 2003 at 22:05, Joao Leao wrote:
On Nov 2, 2003, at 5:16 PM, Ron McFarland wrote:
Greetings list members. This is my joining post.
Recent headlines indicate that there is empirical evidence now
that
our
13 matches
Mail list logo
