Why aren't we our own much smarter descendents?
If you see quantum measurement events as 'uncovering' or 'choosing' from
a larger set of, in some sense, pre-existing earlier possibilities, then
this problem solves itself: the future looks 'bigger' than the present, but
in terms of the real
Why don't we see Others?
I think the anthropic principle neatly explains both scenarios: why we're
here, yet nobody else seems to be.
If life nucleation density is arbitrarily low (e.g. 1/visible univers) we
still wouldn't fail to observe our existance.
It is also worthwhile to mention that the
>TIME AND LIGHTSPEED
>As Wolfram postulates, the concept of time and speed of light c >within
such an informational universe may be related to how fast >the informational
changes (from one state to another) can propagate >(across the qubitstring)
using only local computations as the >medium of stat
Hi all,
I have a query about Tegmark's argument I hope some of you might be
able to address.
First, let me say I am not a physicist or computer science person but
a humble sociologist with some lay physics knowledge on this topic.
Let me also say I find it a morally ghastly proposition that ea
There has been a huge amount written about the Fermi Paradox (why are
there no aliens) over the years, and I don't want to reiterate that here.
You can come up with scenarios in which intelligent life is common but
where they just aren't visible, but IMO such explanations are not very
natural. Ins
Doug Porpora writes:
> Let me also say I find it a morally ghastly proposition that each of
> us is duplicated an infinite number of times in an infinite number of
> universes. If so, why ever bother to do the right thing? Some
> infinite set of me's will be doing the wrong thing, so why not b
6 matches
Mail list logo
