Le 20-janv.-06, à 16:04, John M wrote (in part):
thanks for your approval to my post on 'belief'. To
this one, however, I think you mix up "evidence" with
"assumption". The beautiful sunshine is "assumed" to
be God's gift for us, it is a 1st person idea if we
like it, or find it burning, to ass
Marc Geddes wrote:
> This is very recent (late 2005):
> http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0510010
I've read this and the author's prior two papers on multi-dimensional time.
It appears that his mathematical formulation is able describe a variety
of quantum-mechanical properties by adding one or more
I realize that there are unsolved problems in quantum mechanics that can be
solved by adding dimensions, whether spatial or time. I also know that
added dimensions are describable mathematically, and that some (Tegmark)
hold that this makes them real. However, as Jonathan points out with
resp
Norman Samish wrote:
> I realize that there are unsolved problems in quantum mechanics that can be
> solved by adding dimensions, whether spatial or time. I also know that
> added dimensions are describable mathematically, and that some (Tegmark)
> hold that this makes them real. However, as
4 matches
Mail list logo
