Any conclusion about information erasure, or entropy, in a given system
seems to depend on the particular meaning assigned to the information.
Note that assigned is a verb. What I mean when I say this is that
I'm pointed to the fact that it takes someone to do it.
There's a recurring thought in
My first sentence looks like I was equating information erasure with
entropy, but further down I hope it's clear that I'm treating them as
two different concepts.
Tom
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 07-avr.-06, à 17:46, 1Z a écrit :
To be precise, there is no problem with a very basic, simple notion of
bare substance being the substrate, the bearer, of phenomenal
properties as well
as physical properties.
Are you aware of the mind body problem. Are you
I think there is a need for one more person. This is how I would define
first person pov and third person pov:
Third person is a single history pov that requires the
observation of
an event whose existence does not correlate with the existence of the
observer. This is the classical,
4 matches
Mail list logo
