On 3/22/07, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No. I'm talking about a sort of program/data division - which I recognize
> is arbitrary in computer program - but I think may have an analogue in
> brains. When I write a simulation of a system of ODEs the time evolution of
> the ODEs define t
Le 21-mars-07, à 17:41, Brent Meeker a écrit :
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>> Le 20-mars-07, à 18:05, Brent Meeker a écrit :
>>
>>> What are those relations? Is it a matter of the provenance of the
>>> numbers, e.g. being computed by some subprocess of the UD? Or is an
>>> inherent relation li
Brent, how is this for whimsy:
what are now called black holes, and apparently quite well
verified [and totally not falsified], are conceived to be
regions of space time in which gravity is so strong that nothing
from within can escape. Each black hole is centred upon and
generated by a mass
On 3/14/07, Colin Hales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See previous posts here re EC - Entropy Calculus. This caught my eye,
> thought I'd throw in my $0.02 worth.
>
> I have been working on this idea for a long while now. Am writing it up as
> part of my PhD process.
Makes *complete* sense to
Mark Peaty wrote:
> Brent, how is this for whimsy:
>
> what are now called black holes, and apparently quite well
> verified [and totally not falsified], are conceived to be
> regions of space time in which gravity is so strong that nothing
> from within can escape. Each black hole is centred
5 matches
Mail list logo
