On Jun 14, 7:19 pm, David Nyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kant saw
> this clearly in terms of his 'windowless monads', but these, separated
> by the 'void', indeed had to be correlated by divine intervention,
> since (unaware of each other) they could not interact.
Er, no he didn't. Leibniz
Hi
On 6/16/07, Colin Hales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
" >Chemical potentiation IS electric field...<
...
What is electric field?
John M (frmr chemist)
> Hi,
> I am going to have to be a bit targetted in my responses I am a TAD
> whelmed at the moment.
>
> COLIN
> >> 4) Belief
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 11:17:50PM -, David Nyman wrote:
>
> All this has massive implications for issues of will (free or
> otherwise), suffering, software uploading of minds, etc., etc. - which
> I've indicated in other posts. Consequently, I'd be really interested
> in your response, beca
3 matches
Mail list logo