On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 11:17:50PM -0000, David Nyman wrote:
> All this has massive implications for issues of will (free or
> otherwise), suffering, software uploading of minds, etc., etc. - which
> I've indicated in other posts.  Consequently, I'd be really interested
> in your response, because AFAICS this must be either right(ish),
> wrong(ish), or not-even-wrong(ish).  But if right(ish), potentially it
> gives us a basis for speaking the same language, even if my suggested
> vocabulary is jettisoned for an improved version.  It's certainly
> intended to be Occamish.
> David

David, I was unable to perceive a question in what you just wrote. I
haven't a response, since (sadly) I was unable to understand what you
were talking about. :(



A/Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Australia                                http://www.hpcoders.com.au

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to