On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 11:17:50PM -0000, David Nyman wrote: > > All this has massive implications for issues of will (free or > otherwise), suffering, software uploading of minds, etc., etc. - which > I've indicated in other posts. Consequently, I'd be really interested > in your response, because AFAICS this must be either right(ish), > wrong(ish), or not-even-wrong(ish). But if right(ish), potentially it > gives us a basis for speaking the same language, even if my suggested > vocabulary is jettisoned for an improved version. It's certainly > intended to be Occamish. > > David
David, I was unable to perceive a question in what you just wrote. I haven't a response, since (sadly) I was unable to understand what you were talking about. :( Cheers -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A/Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Mathematics UNSW SYDNEY 2052 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Australia http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
