CDES = Compassion, Democracy, Ethics, and Scientific method
These are prerequisites for the survival of civilisation.
Regards
Mark Peaty CDES
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.arach.net.au/~mpeaty/
David Nyman wrote:
> On Jun 21, 8:03 pm, Mark Peaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I always
This is completely arbitrary and history does not show this.
Quentin
2007/6/22, Mark Peaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> CDES = Compassion, Democracy, Ethics, and Scientific method
>
> These are prerequisites for the survival of civilisation.
>
> Regards
>
> Mark Peaty CDES
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
MN: 'If an
>> mbrane interpenetrates another, this would provide
>> differentiation and thus the beginnings of structure.
>
> Yes, this may be an attractive notion. I've wondered about myself.
> 'Interpenetration' - as a species of interaction - still seems to
> imply that different 'mbranes' ar
On 21/06/07, Russell Standish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RS:
It seems you've miscontrued my "bashing", sorry about that. I was,
perhaps somewhat colourfully, meaning "extracting some meaning". Since
your prose (and often Colin's for that matter) often sounds like
gibberish to me, I have to work at
On 22/06/07, Mark Peaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MP:
Who is to say what mbranes really are, except that in this
interpretation of the idea, each IS its own existence; I assume
we can say nothing definite about how each such existence would
compare with others or anything much about 'where' they
History has not finished yet, and I am proposing that we try to
ensure that it doesn't.
If you truly think I am wrong in my assertion, then you have a
moral duty to show me - and the rest of the world - on the basis
of clear and unambiguous empirical evidence where and how I am
wrong. Without
Mark Peaty wrote:
> History has not finished yet, and I am proposing that we try to
> ensure that it doesn't.
>
> If you truly think I am wrong in my assertion, then you have a
> moral duty to show me - and the rest of the world - on the basis
> of clear and unambiguous empirical evidence wher
On Friday 22 June 2007 20:38:50 Mark Peaty wrote:
> History has not finished yet, and I am proposing that we try to
> ensure that it doesn't.
Agreed, but it was not what I meant to say... it is the opposite... you can't
assert "Compassion, Democracy, Ethics, and Scientific method. These are
pre
Dear David.
do not expect from me the theoretical level of technicality-talk er get
from Bruno: I talk (and think) common sense (my own) and if the
theoretical technicalities sound strange, I return to my thinking.
That's what I got, that's what I use (plagiarized from the Hungarian commi
joke: wh
QA: '... you can't
> assert "Compassion, Democracy, Ethics, and Scientific method. These are
> prerequisites for the survival of civilisation."... if you really believe
> that History has not finished yet.
MP: The fact of me making the assertion is logical; what I
assert is not a closed prescr
10 matches
Mail list logo
