On Jul 9, 1:39 am, "Mohsen Ravanbakhsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> While I was reading the previous discussion; "justifying theory of
> everything" , I thought of my recent problem with still imperfection of our
> TOE. The problem is:
> Multiverse by itself is a choice, and e
David Nyman skrev:
> Consequently we can't 'interview' B-Universe objects.
>
It is true that we can not interview objects in B-Universe. One object
in one universe can not affect any object in some other universe.
But we can look at the objects in an other universe. Just in the same
way th
Bruno Marchal skrev:
Le 05-juil.-07, à 14:19, Torgny Tholerus wrote:
David Nyman skrev:
You have however drawn our attention to something very interesting and
important IMO. This concerns the necessary entailment of 'existence'.
1. The relation 1
On 09/07/07, Torgny Tholerus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One object in one universe can not affect any object in some other universe.
> But we can look at the objects in an other universe.
I would say that the conjunction of the above two sentences is a contradiction.
> Because
> everything th
On Jul 9, 7:47 pm, "David Nyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/07/07, Torgny Tholerus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Because
> > everything that happens in A-Universe will also happen in B-Universe.
> > All objects in A-Universe obey the laws of physics, and all objects in
> > B-Universe
(Reposted because of some techical problems...)
On Jul 7, 2:00 pm, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 05-juil.-07, à 14:19, Torgny Tholerus wrote:
>
>
>
> > David Nyman skrev:
> >> You have however drawn our attention to something very interesting and
> >> important IMO. This concerns
On 09/07/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There can be no dynamic time. In the space-time, time is always
> static.
Then you must get very bored ;)
David
>
>
>
> On Jul 9, 7:47 pm, "David Nyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 09/07/07, Torgny Tholerus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
7 matches
Mail list logo
