Le 24-oct.-07, à 20:32, Tom Caylor a écrit :
This might be of interest to some of you, for instance Bruno, since
one of the ideals expounded here is keep it simple. Sorry I haven't
been participating here.
From Wolfram Science Group:
We're excited to announce that the $25,000 Wolfram
Le 25-oct.-07, à 03:25, Wei Dai a écrit :
Rolf Nelson wrote:
1. Provides a possible explanation for the Measure Problem of why we
shouldn't be extremely surprised to find we live in a lawful
universe, rather than an extremely chaotic universe, or a homogeneous
cloud of gas.
One thing I
Rolf Nelson wrote:
Your observations to date are consistent with all three models. What
are the odds that you live in (2) but not (1) or (3)? Surely the
answer is extremely high, but how do we justify it *mathematically*
(and philosophically)?
My current position is, forget the odds. Let's
On Oct 25, 3:25 am, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 25-oct.-07, à 03:25, Wei Dai a écrit :
Rolf Nelson wrote:
An example
that Yudowsky gave: you might spend resources on constructing a unique
arrow pointing at yourself, in order to increase your measure by
making it easier
4 matches
Mail list logo
