On Jul 31, 1:26 am, Stathis Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Popper showed that an infinite number of theories is compatible is any
given set of finite observations. Mere algorithmic shuffling to
calculate Pr(B) probablities according to the Bayes formula won't help
much.
Arsthetics?
do we have a definition that satisfies *general* considerations? I doubt,
because I cannot find one that applies to different ethnic, cultural (- even
within one), at different times even if considered only in HUMAN beings. the
'scientific' terms are applying to (dis?)liking and
Hi,
I forward it to this list... I'm not sure it pass the barier of
moderation on FOR, anyway I think it is relevant... (or I'm too
presomptuous to see it is not).
Quentin
-- Forwarded message --
From: Quentin Anciaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/7/29
Subject: Re: Theories and
-- Forwarded message --
From: Quentin Anciaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/7/31
Subject: Re: Theories and Reality (was Re: Lakatos)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/7/30 Peter D Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Quentin Anciaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
A
4 matches
Mail list logo