Hi Evgenii,
I understand how the hypothetico-deductive way is working and I am
amazed by expressions in mathematical logic. Yet, sometimes it is
not bad to start from the end, this might also help.
I agree. The amazing thing is that if we start from the end, we
get ... Plotinus or Ploti
On 03 Mar 2011, at 02:54, Pzomby wrote:
On Mar 2, 6:03 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 02 Mar 2011, at 05:48, Pzomby wrote:
That is why I limit myself for the TOE to natural numbers and
their
addition and multiplication.
The reason is that it is enough, by comp, and nobody (except
perhaps
If you have a UDA inside a physical universe, there is real physics
(qua physicalevents)
outside it, and there is a real study of physics outside it as well.
What goes on in a
virtualised environment is not real. You could feed virtualised people
false information
about the past, but that would not
On Mar 3, 2:07 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 03 Mar 2011, at 02:54, Pzomby wrote:
>
> > On Mar 2, 6:03 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> On 02 Mar 2011, at 05:48, Pzomby wrote:
>
> >> That is why I limit myself for the TOE to natural numbers and
> >> their
> >> addition and multiplica
On 3/3/2011 10:44 AM, Pzomby wrote:
My brief opinion(s):
As well as numbers having dispositional and computational properties,
numbers remain symbolic or representative of their own dispositional,
relational and computational characteristics or attributes. A TOE
will describe in detail what num
On 03 Mar 2011, at 18:39, 1Z wrote:
If you have a UDA inside a physical universe,
I guess you mean "a UD inside a physical universe".
UDA is for the UD-Argument. The Universal Dovetailer Argument.
there is real physics
(qua physicalevents)
outside it, and there is a real study of physi
6 matches
Mail list logo