On 29 May 2013, at 02:29, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
On 27 May 2013, at 23:18, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno:
do you indeed exclude the "other" animals from being selfconcious?
?
No, not at all. My current feeling (for what is worth) is that
On 29 May 2013, at 06:59, Kim Jones wrote:
On 29/05/2013, at 2:04 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
You don't need language to feel the hotness of a fire.
Bruno
You don't need language to feel the effect of music.
Good point.
"Language is the greatest barrier to communication that still
On 29 May 2013, at 08:33, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/28/2013 11:13 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 May 2013, at 19:23, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/28/2013 9:04 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 May 2013, at 01:53, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/27/2013 2:18 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno:
do you indeed exclude the
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> If you want to communicate why should I need to search at all? And if
> even Google doesn't know what the hell Bp&p is then it's ridiculous to
> expect your readers to know what you're talking about.
>
>
> > Come on, John. Search for "tr
Brent: after lots of back-and-forth you wrote:
*"...I don't see the analogy. I don't think consciousness can be negative,
or even that it can be measured by one dimension. "All-or-nothing" would
be a function that is either 1 or 0. If you can be conscious of red and
green, then I'd say you are m
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems#Construction_of_a_statement_about_.22provability.22
2013/5/29 John Clark
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> >> If you want to communicate why should I need to search at all? And if
>> even Google doe
On 29 May 2013, at 17:47, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems#Construction_of_a_statement_about_.22provability.22
2013/5/29 John Clark
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
>> If you want to communicate why should I ne
On 29 May 2013, at 18:37, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 May 2013, at 17:47, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems#Construction_of_a_statement_about_.22provability.22
2013/5/29 John Clark
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Bruno Marchal
wr
On 5/29/2013 12:38 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 May 2013, at 08:33, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/28/2013 11:13 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 May 2013, at 19:23, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/28/2013 9:04 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 May 2013, at 01:53, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/27/2013 2:18 PM, John Mi
On 5/29/2013 8:45 AM, John Mikes wrote:
Brent: after lots of back-and-forth you wrote:
/*"...I don't see the analogy. I don't think consciousness can be negative, or even that
it can be measured by one dimension. "All-or-nothing" would be a function that is
either 1 or 0. If you can be consc
This is fun!
http://youtu.be/EJsD-3jtXz0?t=24m16s
It exist!
--
Onward!
Stephen
I apologize in advance for the gross errors that this post
and all of my posts will contain. ;-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsu
On 5/29/2013 9:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 May 2013, at 18:37, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 May 2013, at 17:47, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems#Construction_of_a_statement_about_.22provability.22
2013/5/29 John Clark mailto:jo
12 matches
Mail list logo
