stem is wrong, but we have been able to
draw this conclusion because we have considered the hypotesis of applying
the physical system itself. But if it was wrong, the conclusions would be
wrong, too. Here we have the paradox.
Federico Marulli
niverse. But if we lived in another part of our multiverse we would think
in a completely different way and no a priori principles can tell us when
one is right.
Federico Marulli
--
Federico Marulli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello everybody,
I read all your messages and I would like to say something about them. I
think that the concept of "magic universes" considered by Matt King and Hal
Finney and the demonstration that we are not in one of them is improper
I have just read my last message and I have realized there were a lot of
mistakes dealing with the English language. I'm sorry for that, I hope to
improve my writing skills as soon as possible.
Federico
Matt King wrote:
> ...However, the laws of probability themselves are not physical but
> mathematical in origin. Even in a 'magical' universe, you would still
> have the same basic laws of probability (Gaussian distributions and the
> like) as this is just math, and math is truly universal. Fo
Federico Marulli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David Barrett-Lennard wrote:
> In the thread "a possible paradox", there was talk about a vanishingly
> small number of "magical" universes where strange things happen.
> However, it seems to me that the bigger risk is that a
unsubscibe
8 matches
Mail list logo
