Re: Introduction (Digital Physics)

2001-06-18 Thread Karl Stiefvater
O > Really? So what is the exact circumference OO O > of a circle with a diameter of 2 inches? OOO O OOO O O O 2pi. OOO O O O O O O O O O -k

Re: why not high complexity?

2001-06-18 Thread Karl Stiefvater
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OO O O O > > then lim i->inf e(i) = inf. O > O > This will not give you a uniform O > distribution on infinitely many things. O O O O yes. i agree. O

Re: why not high complexity?

2001-05-31 Thread Karl Stiefvater
oops. my last message didn't make it to the full list. O O > Maybe you'd like to write down formally OO > what you mean. O O O O sure. i suspect we're talking past each other.

why not high complexity?

2001-05-27 Thread Karl Stiefvater
O O O OO O hi. O O OOi've just stumbled upon this discussion - i'm OO O trying to catch up. i have a question/comment - OO OOO OO i'm wondering if it's been raised before - and O OOO O O which message i should jump forward to to find O OOO

Re: why not high complexity?

2001-05-30 Thread Karl Stiefvater
aha! thank you for replying. i'll say more when OOO O O i get a moment, but let me first clean-up my O OO O sloppy language: OO O O O O> ??? - There is no way of assigning equal OO O O O > nonvanishing probability to infinitely

Re: Introduction (Digital Physics)

2001-06-26 Thread Karl Stiefvater
OO oh dear. i can't resist the temptation to jump O O O into the fray. please feel free to ignore me. O OO Joel wrote: OOO OO > Ahhh... but does that little program ever O OO > return a value? Does it ev