Re: A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.

2012-05-13 Thread socra...@bezeqint.net
What is the electron configuration ?

Is the electron a photon with toroidal topology?

http://www.cybsoc.org/electron.pdf

==.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Re: A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.

2012-05-13 Thread socra...@bezeqint.net
#
A New Limit on Photon Mass.

http://www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/625-2.html

===.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Re: A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.

2012-05-09 Thread socra...@bezeqint.net


 Electron’s fine structure constant.
=.
It is interesting to understand the Sommerfeld  formula:
 a= e^2 / h*c, where {a} is  fine structure constant: 1/137
Feynman  expressed  (a ) quantity  as
 ‘ by the god given damnation to all physicists ‘.
But the fine structure constant is not independent quantity,
it is only part of formula of an electron: e^2=h*ca .
The constant {a} is only one of three constants which
belong to the formula of electron: e^2=h*ca.
(a), (c), (h*) are three constants which created the electron.
And if we don’t know (a) then we don’t know what electron is.
Therefore in the internet is possible to find 100 different models
 of electron. For example.
The book What is the Electron?
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada.  2005. /
In this book:
‘ More than ten different models of the electron are presented here.
(!!!)
 More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
 thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.’

ftp://210.45.114.81/physics/%CA%E9%BC%AE/What%20Is%20the%20Electron%20by%20Volodimir%20Simulik%20.pdf

All of these models are problematical.
We can read hundreds books about philosophy of physics.
But how can we trust them if we don’t know what electron is.
And somebody wrote:
 If  I well remember Einstein once said about particle physics:
why do we study some many particles?
 Understand really what is an electron would be enough.
. . .
‘ Finding the structure of the electron will be the key
 to finding the origin of the natural laws.’
=.
By my peasant logic at first it is better to understand
the closest and simplest particle photon /electron and
then to study the far away spaces and another particles.
=.
Best withes.
Israel Sadovnik  Socratus

==.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Re: A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.

2012-05-05 Thread Craig Weinberg
On May 5, 12:17 am, socra...@bezeqint.net socra...@bezeqint.net
wrote:
 A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.
 =.
 Electron isn’t a point.
 Electron has a geometrical form.

Maybe not. Maybe we infer geometry because of measurement using
geometric instruments.

 Electron’s geometrical form isn’t static, isn’t firm.

Which would be the case if that form wasn't literally an object.

 Electron’s geometrical form can be changed by his own inner spin.

When we stimulate matter in particular ways, it changes our
instrument's detection (vicarious imitation) of that stimulation.

 Electron’s own inner spin can be described with three ( 3 ) formulas:
 Plank: h=Et,
 Einstein:  h=kb,
 Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck: h*=h/2pi.
 The speed of photon is minimal : c=1.
 The speed of electron is c1
 Quantum of light, photon and electron are one and the same
  particle in different conditions.

Or different moods of atoms or even molecules.

 =.
 Question:
 Where did electron come from?
 Answer:
 Electron came from the Kingdom of Coldness: T=0K.
 =.

Why not from Kingdom of Difference? T= perception(0K↔∞K)

Craig

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.

2012-05-04 Thread socra...@bezeqint.net
A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.
=.
Electron isn’t a point.
Electron has a geometrical form.
Electron’s geometrical form isn’t static, isn’t firm.
Electron’s geometrical form can be changed by his own inner spin.
Electron’s own inner spin can be described with three ( 3 ) formulas:
Plank: h=Et,
Einstein:  h=kb,
Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck: h*=h/2pi.
The speed of photon is minimal : c=1.
The speed of electron is c1
Quantum of light, photon and electron are one and the same
 particle in different conditions.
=.
Question:
Where did electron come from?
Answer:
Electron came from the Kingdom of Coldness: T=0K.
=.
All the best.
Israel  Socratus
===.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.