Re: Comp and isomorphic continuity.

2001-03-19 Thread Hal Ruhl
Dear Bruno: I was referring below to the isomorphic couplings and their existence not the existence of physical universes which I agree may be considered redundant and not actually in the Everything including my model of it. But this brings to mind an interesting possibility. My model may act

Re: Comp and isomorphic continuity.

2001-03-19 Thread Marchal
Hal Ruhl wrote: >As I understand it Comp says that all those physical universe isomorphic >couplings to the output of the UD somehow exist. With comp there is no *physical* universe. Just (relative) computational histories. Appearance of *physical universe* are explained as first person plural

Comp and isomorphic continuity.

2001-03-18 Thread Hal Ruhl
Another question on the Scanner/Transporter/Duplicator [The "STD" to coin yet another acronym.]: As I understand it Comp says that all those physical universe isomorphic couplings to the output of the UD somehow exist. But the STD - itself such a physical isomorphism - somehow must switch ot