On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 5:11 PM, John Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
>> > We are now approaching a point where we can have supercomputers with the
>> > same estimated computational power of a human brain, but we are very far
>> > from replicating its capabilities.
>
>
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 Telmo Menezes wrote:
> We are now approaching a point where we can have supercomputers with the
> same estimated computational power of a human brain, but we are very far
> from replicating its capabilities.
Very far?
> Chess is a very narrow case
>
But being the best J
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Telmo Menezes
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 3:33 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Deep Blue vs The Tianhe-2 Supercomputer
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:16
> -Chris
>
> -Original Message-
> From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Telmo Menezes
> Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 2:00 PM
> To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Deep Blue vs The Tianhe-2 Supe
decentralised architecture of the brain!
Telmo.
> -Chris
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Telmo Menezes
> Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 2:00 PM
> To: everything-list@google
Behalf Of Telmo Menezes
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 2:00 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Deep Blue vs The Tianhe-2 Supercomputer
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
> As I tried to comment in the other thread concerning chess: it's not
Of Telmo Menezes
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 2:00 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Deep Blue vs The Tianhe-2 Supercomputer
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
> As I tried to comment in the other thread concerning chess: it's not
>
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
> As I tried to comment in the other thread concerning chess: it's not just
> about power, it's also about quality of coding. Just one fresh opening, a
> novel variation or line in the mid game, a bug in the code, one position
> false
As I tried to comment in the other thread concerning chess: it's not just
about power, it's also about quality of coding. Just one fresh opening, a
novel variation or line in the mid game, a bug in the code, one position
falsely assessed, and all computing power in the universe will still lose
that
Suppose that in 1997 you had a very difficult problem to solve, so
difficult that it would take Deep Blue, the supercomputer that beat the
best human chess player in the world, 18 years to solve, what should you
do? You'd do better to let Moore's law do all the heavy lifting and leave
Deep Blue alo
10 matches
Mail list logo