On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 05 Mar 2013, at 19:39, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 12:45:11 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05 Mar 2013, at 08:43, Jesse Mazer wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Pierz wrote:
>>>
>
On 05 Mar 2013, at 19:39, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 12:45:11 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Mar 2013, at 08:43, Jesse Mazer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Pierz wrote:
Really Craig? It invalidates mechanistic assumptions about eyes?
I'm sure the re
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 8:39:37 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
>>
>> Hi Craig,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>> > On Monday, March 4, 2013 11:27:21 PM UTC-5, Pierz wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Really Craig? It inval
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 12:45:11 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 05 Mar 2013, at 08:43, Jesse Mazer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Pierz >wrote:
>
>> Really Craig? It invalidates mechanistic assumptions about eyes? I'm sure
>> the researchers would be astonished at suc
On 05 Mar 2013, at 08:43, Jesse Mazer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Pierz wrote:
Really Craig? It invalidates mechanistic assumptions about eyes? I'm
sure the researchers would be astonished at such a wild conclusion.
All the research shows is brain plasticity in interpreting s
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 8:39:37 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
> > On Monday, March 4, 2013 11:27:21 PM UTC-5, Pierz wrote:
> >>
> >> Really Craig? It invalidates mechanistic assumptions about eyes? I'm
> sure
Hi Craig,
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> On Monday, March 4, 2013 11:27:21 PM UTC-5, Pierz wrote:
>>
>> Really Craig? It invalidates mechanistic assumptions about eyes? I'm sure
>> the researchers would be astonished at such a wild conclusion. All the
>> research shows is
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 2:43:26 AM UTC-5, jessem wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Pierz >wrote:
>
>> Really Craig? It invalidates mechanistic assumptions about eyes? I'm sure
>> the researchers would be astonished at such a wild conclusion. All the
>> research shows is brain pl
On Monday, March 4, 2013 11:27:21 PM UTC-5, Pierz wrote:
>
> Really Craig? It invalidates mechanistic assumptions about eyes? I'm sure
> the researchers would be astonished at such a wild conclusion. All the
> research shows is brain plasticity in interpreting signals from unusual
> neural pathw
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Pierz wrote:
> Really Craig? It invalidates mechanistic assumptions about eyes? I'm sure
> the researchers would be astonished at such a wild conclusion. All the
> research shows is brain plasticity in interpreting signals from unusual
> neural pathways. How does
On 3/4/2013 8:27 PM, Pierz wrote:
Really Craig? It invalidates mechanistic assumptions about eyes? I'm sure the
researchers would be astonished at such a wild conclusion. All the research
shows is brain plasticity in interpreting signals from unusual neural pathways.
How does that invalidate m
Really Craig? It invalidates mechanistic assumptions about eyes? I'm sure the
researchers would be astonished at such a wild conclusion. All the research
shows is brain plasticity in interpreting signals from unusual neural pathways.
How does that invalidate mechanism?
--
You received this mes
Supports my view of sense, Invalidates mechanistic assumptions about eyes.
The genie about the reality of sense just doesn't seem to want to stay in
the bottle...
Craig
http://www.newswise.com/articles/ectopic-eyes-function-without-connection-to-brain
*Experiments with tadpoles show ectopic ey
13 matches
Mail list logo
