Re: Mirror Symmetry

2002-02-06 Thread George Levy
he ordinary matter universe. George > Saibal Mitra wrote: > > It has been conventional wisdom that the fundamental laws of physics > are not invariant under parity. Now, the computational complexity of a > model that lacks mirror symmetry is much larger than a similar mirror &g

Re: Mirror Symmetry

2002-02-05 Thread Saibal Mitra
n the exact parity model. Saibal - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 10:45 PM Subject: Re: Mirror Symmetry > > > Saibal Mitra: > > ... a so-called mirror world could exist. Nature would th

Re: Mirror Symmetry

2002-02-03 Thread H J Ruhl
At 2/3/02, you wrote: >It has been conventional wisdom that the fundamental laws of physics are >not invariant under parity. Now, the computational complexity of a model >that lacks mirror symmetry is much larger than a similar mirror symmetric >model. It would thus be very stran

Re: Mirror Symmetry

2002-02-03 Thread hpm
Saibal Mitra: > ... a so-called mirror world could exist. Nature would then be > symmetric under parity. Their so-called exact parity model predicts > the existence of so-called ''mirror matter''. Each particle is > postulated to have a mirror partner with similar properties (they > behave exact

Mirror Symmetry

2002-02-03 Thread Saibal Mitra
It has been conventional wisdom that the fundamental laws of physics are not invariant under parity. Now, the computational complexity of a model that lacks mirror symmetry is much larger than a similar mirror symmetric model. It would thus be very strange if Nature is indeed not invariant