QM:collapse vs no collapse

2011-08-23 Thread ronaldheld
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1108/1108.4175v1.pdf Any comments? Ronald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To

Re: QM:collapse vs no collapse

2011-08-23 Thread Stephen P. King
On 8/23/2011 7:20 AM, ronaldheld wrote: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1108/1108.4175v1.pdf Any comments? Ronald Hi, From the paper: The most challenging idea in these experiments was Scully’s delayed- choice: one has a pair of photons propagating in

Re: QM:collapse vs no collapse

2011-08-23 Thread meekerdb
On 8/23/2011 4:20 AM, ronaldheld wrote: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1108/1108.4175v1.pdf Any comments? Ronald Attempts to think about the fate of the photons in a collapse way seemed to suggest an effect going backwards in time. Hence, the