It's not so novel as Stafford supposes. Lewis Carrol Epstein has
written a very nice little book "Relativity Visualized" which uses the
same viewpoint. It is just observing that the proper velocity of an
object is always 1. Epstein however keeps this in perspective, it's
just a transformati
>
> I came across a very interesting and novel "interpretation" of
> relativity in which the author claims to resolve the mathematical
> incompatibilities with merging QM and relativity.
I didn't look at the article too closely, but it seems to be talking about
special relativity rather than
2 matches
Mail list logo
