RE: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?

2009-01-03 Thread Hal Ruhl
-Original Message- From: everything-l...@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 3:25 AM To: everything-l...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD? On 03 Jan 2009, at 02:04

Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?

2009-01-02 Thread Abram Demski
: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD? Hal, I do not understand why the Nothings are fundamentally incomplete. I interpreted this as inconsistency, partly due to the following line: 5) At least one divisor type - the Nothings or N(k)- encompass no distinction but must encompass this one

Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?

2009-01-02 Thread Bruno Marchal
: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD? Hal, I do not understand why the Nothings are fundamentally incomplete. I interpreted this as inconsistency, partly due to the following line: 5) At least one divisor type - the Nothings or N(k)- encompass no distinction but must encompass this one

Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?

2009-01-02 Thread Abram Demski
- From: everything-l...@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Abram Demski Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 12:59 AM To: everything-l...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD? Hal, I do not understand why the Nothings

RE: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?

2008-12-29 Thread Hal Ruhl
, December 29, 2008 12:59 AM To: everything-l...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD? Hal, I do not understand why the Nothings are fundamentally incomplete. I interpreted this as inconsistency, partly due to the following line: 5) At least one divisor type

Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?

2008-12-28 Thread Abram Demski
27, 2008 5:36 AM To: everything-l...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD? Hi Hal, To see if your system is a UD, the first thing to do should consist in writing a program capable of simulating it on a computer, and then to see for which value of some

RE: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?

2008-12-28 Thread Hal Ruhl
to my approach. Is it a UD? Hal, Is there a pattern to how the system responds to its own incompleteness? You say that there is not a pattern to the traces, but what do you mean by that? --- That is not what I actually said. I indicated that there were no restrictions on the copy

Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?

2008-12-27 Thread Bruno Marchal
Hi Hal, To see if your system is a UD, the first thing to do should consist in writing a program capable of simulating it on a computer, and then to see for which value of some parameters (on which it is supposed to dovetail) it simulates a universal Turing machine. To simulate it on a

RE: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD?

2008-12-27 Thread Hal Ruhl
...@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 5:36 AM To: everything-l...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Revisions to my approach. Is it a UD? Hi Hal, To see if your system is a UD, the first thing to do should consist