Dear John, thank you for reading my text!
> >
>> Nagarjuna’s thought is based on the idea that nothing exists
>> intrinsically. Everything exists only relationship to something else;
>
>
>
> Well, if there were only one object in the universe it would be
> meaningless to say that object had
On Friday, February 23, 2018 at 3:01:08 PM UTC+1, telmo_menezes wrote:
>
> I find it interesting that you resort to an image. I suspect that what you
> are trying to communicate cannot be fully communicated with language. That
> is perhaps what art is for?
>
>
Well, images and art are a languag
Francesco D'Isa wrote in:
https://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/DIsa_Nothing_is_fundamental.pdf
>
> Nagarjuna’s thought is based on the idea that nothing exists
> intrinsically. Everything exists only relationship to something else;
Well, if there were only one object in the univers
I find it interesting that you resort to an image. I suspect that what you
are trying to communicate cannot be fully communicated with language. That
is perhaps what art is for?
Cheers
Telmo.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Francesco D'Isa
wrote:
> Hello Telmo, thank you very much for welcomin
Hello Telmo, thank you very much for welcoming and reading! I'm very glad
you enjoyed the text and for your comment on it.
Of course that's the hardest part. I agree that the argument in §6 is
circular someway, but I'd tell that its circularity is broken by its
opening to an infinite regress, b
Hello Francesco,
Welcome to the group!
I like your essay and essentially agree with what you say. My only
problem is with your treatment of the principle of non-contradition. I
feel that your reasoning there becomes circular: all truths are
relative, so the principle of non-contradition is also r
6 matches
Mail list logo
