My comments at the bottom too.
Jean-Michel
At 08:51 AM 1/22/2003 -0800, Eric Hawthorne wrote:
My comment at the bottom of the message.
Eric
Jean-Michel Veuillen wrote:
Eric Hawthorne wrote:
Unless a world (i.e. a sequence of information state changes)
has produced intelligent observers
My comment at the bottom of the message.
Eric
Jean-Michel Veuillen wrote:
Eric Hawthorne wrote:
Unless a world (i.e. a sequence of information state changes)
has produced intelligent observers though, there will be
no one around in it to argue whether it exists or not.
Then our universe
Jean-Michel Veuillen wrote:
> Then our universe did not exist before there were
> intelligent observers in it, which is not true.
>
> I think that is better to say that all
> self-consistent mathematical structures exist.
> To restrict existence to universes containing
> SASs (self-aware struc
At 08:40 PM 1/17/2003 -0800, Eric Hawthorne wrote:
John M wrote:
Eric:
do I detect in your 'circumstances' some 'anthropocentric/metric/logic'
restrictions? is the multiverse exclusively built according to the system
we devised on this planet as 'our physical laws'? (your 'factor' #1,
althou
inal
Message -From: "Eric Hawthorne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:40 PMSubject: Re:
Constraints on "everything existing"> John M
wrote:>> >Eric:> >> >do I detect in
John M wrote:
Eric:
do I detect in your 'circumstances' some 'anthropocentric/metric/logic'
restrictions? is the multiverse exclusively built according to the system
we devised on this planet as 'our physical laws'? (your 'factor' #1,
although you oincluded in factor #2 the (CLASSICAL existen
Eric:
do I detect in your 'circumstances' some 'anthropocentric/metric/logic'
restrictions? is the multiverse exclusively built according to the system
we devised on this planet as 'our physical laws'? (your 'factor' #1,
although you oincluded in factor #2 the (CLASSICAL existence) modifier.)
7 matches
Mail list logo
