George wrote also:
>h
I suppose this is your comment for my other modal post too!
Well, well, well ...
But then how will I explain you how to extract QM from the
first person plural if I cannot use the logical tools, which
are (frankly) indispensable? (L
George Levy wrote
>Actually, I think that the first person point of view is more fundamental
>than
>third person. Yet I do not deny the third person. The objectivity of nature
>(third person characteristic) is an illusion brought about because first
>persons
>observers share the same "frame of
The following post was returned to me I'll try to send it again
Marchal wrote:
>
> But perhaps there is something more I should ask you before. You said
> in response to some post of me, in some preceeding dialog:
> <<>>
>
> Well, I know you are not stuck in third person (like Schmidhub
3 matches
Mail list logo
