Re: On comp and the is-ought problem of Hume

2012-08-22 Thread Bruno Marchal
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 8/22/2012 Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything could function." - Receiving the following content - From: Bruno Marchal Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-08-21, 14:31:50 Subject: Re: O

Re: Re: On comp and the is-ought problem of Hume

2012-08-22 Thread Roger Clough
- Receiving the following content - From: Bruno Marchal Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-08-21, 14:31:50 Subject: Re: On comp and the is-ought problem of Hume On 20 Aug 2012, at 15:01, Alberto G. Corona wrote: In evolutionary terms, is and ougth reflect the double nature of a social b

Re: On comp and the is-ought problem of Hume

2012-08-21 Thread Bruno Marchal
O. Roger , rclo...@verizon.net 8/20/2012 Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything could function." - Receiving the following content - From: meekerdb Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-08-18, 15:04:00 Subject: Re: On comp and the i

Re: Re: On comp and the is-ought problem of Hume

2012-08-20 Thread Alberto G. Corona
could function." > > - Receiving the following content - > *From:* meekerdb > *Receiver:* everything-list > *Time:* 2012-08-18, 15:04:00 > *Subject:* Re: On comp and the is-ought problem of Hume > > Who’s Afraid of the Naturalistic Fallacy? > Oliver Curry

Re: Re: On comp and the is-ought problem of Hume

2012-08-20 Thread Roger
2-08-18, 15:04:00 Subject: Re: On comp and the is-ought problem of Hume Who’s Afraid of the Naturalistic Fallacy? Oliver Curry, Centre Research Associate, Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics, UK WC2A 2AE, UK; Email: o.s.cu...@lse.ac.uk. Abstract: Davi

Re: Re: On comp and the is-ought problem of Hume

2012-08-20 Thread Roger
. Theory schmeery. Roger , rclo...@verizon.net 8/20/2012 Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything could function." - Receiving the following content - From: Bruno Marchal Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-08-19, 05:56:54 Subject:

Re: On comp and the is-ought problem of Hume

2012-08-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 18 Aug 2012, at 17:08, Roger wrote: Hi Bruno Marchal This is probably just my ignorance of what comp is, but there seems to be a discrepancy between comp, which fits with Plato or Platonism, and real life, which actually fits more with Aristotle. Plato is "ought to be" and Aristotle is "is

Re: On comp and the is-ought problem of Hume

2012-08-18 Thread meekerdb
Who’s Afraid of the Naturalistic Fallacy? Oliver Curry, Centre Research Associate, Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics, UK WC2A 2AE, UK; Email: o.s.cu...@lse.ac.uk. Abstract: David Hume argued that values are the projections of natural human desires,