> On 22 Feb 2020, at 09:26, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> Example:
>
>
> Here is the code for the Standard Model. What if it were 1 times bigger?
It would be 1 times more an indication that we miss the theory, or it could
mean that the history measure in arithmetic is very
On Saturday, February 22, 2020 at 2:30:45 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:31 PM Philip Thrift > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> A theory T_b in a language L_b can be explained in terms of a theory T_a
>> in a language L_a if T_b/L_b can be *translated into* or *compiled to*
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:31 PM Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, February 22, 2020 at 1:20:28 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, February 22, 2020 at 9:00:08 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:53 AM Philip Thrift
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > *Name
On 2/21/2020 11:53 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
Name one thing that is explained by science.
Why you can't build a perpetual motion machine. Why the Sun comes up in
the morning. Why cyanide will kill you. Why radiation causes mutations
Brent
Same thing: Name one thing that is
On Saturday, February 22, 2020 at 1:20:28 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, February 22, 2020 at 9:00:08 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:53 AM Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>> > *Name one thing that is explained by science.*
>>
>>
>> Explain what you mean
On Saturday, February 22, 2020 at 9:00:08 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:53 AM Philip Thrift > wrote:
>
> > *Name one thing that is explained by science.*
>
>
> Explain what you mean by explain. I'll tell you what I mean by the word,
> describing something complex in
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:53 AM Philip Thrift wrote:
> *Name one thing that is explained by science.*
Explain what you mean by explain. I'll tell you what I mean by the word,
describing something complex in terms of something simpler so well that
accurate predictions can be made.
*> Here is
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
*> this is nothing new.*
And so just before he was vaporized the last surviving human turned to the
Jupiter Brain and said "I still think I'm smarter than you".
John K Clark
--
You received this
Example:
Here is the code for the Standard Model. What if it were 1 times bigger?
[image: Equations image]
Lagrangian standard model
@philipthrift
On Saturday, February 22, 2020 at 1:53:28 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
> Name one thing that is explained by science.
>
> Same
Name one thing that is explained by science.
Same thing: Name one thing that is explained (by science or) any (other)
profession.
@philipthrift
On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 5:14:53 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
> Science has always aimed at understanding. Using ML to solve a problem is
> more
This is pretty remarkable. Blood from mice is being taken to see if this
has indeed removed a bacteria.
LC
On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 12:57:30 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>
> Powerful antibiotics discovered using AI
>
Science has always aimed at understanding. Using ML to solve a problem
is more a matter of technology and engineering. But this is nothing
new. Technology has often led and science followed. Very good stone
arches were built long before stress analysis was developed. And as
Oliver
*A Deep Learning Approach to Antibiotic Discovery*
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(20)30102-1
This could legitimately called a paradigm shift in scientific methodology.
@philipthrift
On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 12:57:30 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>
> Powerful antibiotics
I have been waiting for this for a long time. Machine intel actually
discovering and more importantly, innovating new things. I prefer Narrow Ai
over Minsky's guy in a box. I'd rather have better energy systems, medicines,
and space ships, than go all aquiver over smart algorithms, and
14 matches
Mail list logo
