Le 09-nov.-06, à 13:57, 1Z a écrit :
>
>
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> Le 03-nov.-06, à 15:06, 1Z a écrit :
>>
>>> We don't *have* to assume that there is a gulf between the first
>>> personal
>>> and third personal.
>>
>>
>> A gulf? Do you agree there is at least a difference?
>
>
> The difference
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 03-nov.-06, à 15:06, 1Z a écrit :
>
> > We don't *have* to assume that there is a gulf between the first
> > personal
> > and third personal.
>
>
> A gulf? Do you agree there is at least a difference?
The difference boils down to the incommuncability of certain things,
Le 03-nov.-06, à 15:06, 1Z a écrit :
> We don't *have* to assume that there is a gulf between the first
> personal
> and third personal.
A gulf? Do you agree there is at least a difference?
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 02-nov.-06, à 17:34, David Nyman a écrit :
>
>
> >
> >
> > Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >
> >> I don't understand really what you mean by "AUDA is not RITSIAR". AUDA
> >> is just the lobian interview, or if you prefer the complete
> >> mathematical formalization of the UDA rea
4 matches
Mail list logo