Re: Re: How can words be transformed into numbers ?

2012-11-10 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Bruno Marchal  

OK, so it's not numbers alone (pure numbers),
something else is required. At the very minimum that
something else must be intelligence,
the ability to essentially freely make choices of one's own.

Nothing can be done without intelligence. 

But if you can do that, what's special about numbers ?  
Geometry, such as created network, would make more sense.
Or natural language. or arithmetic functions.

Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 
11/10/2012  
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen 


- Receiving the following content -  
From: Bruno Marchal  
Receiver: everything-list  
Time: 2012-11-09, 14:26:09 
Subject: Re: How can words be transformed into numbers ? 


On 09 Nov 2012, at 13:41, Roger Clough wrote: 

 Hi Bruno Marchal 
 
 So how would 
 
 I see a cat. 
 
 be transformed into numbers ? 
 
 Maybe 63 7 89 ? 

I am afraid that will not be enough. I see a cat, to get put in  
number, with the 1-I and 3-I of you, you will need to scan your brain  
at the correct comp subst level (which exist by comp assumption), and  
this when you are looking at a cat. 
Then the real 1-I is not in that number, but in all the computation  
going through the state described by that number relatively to our  
most probable environment. The number can be used to reimplement you  
in some computer, and then you will be able to manifest your seeing a  
cat to us. 





 
 I could do that if I indexed all of the words in Roget's thesaurus, 
 but I don't think the numbers would mean anything besides numbers. 
 Because the meanings of words come from context -- not only in where 
 they are placed in a text but how they arose from culture. 
 Language is culture. 

You are right. 



 
 And in mandarin, three characters placed together might not 
 have anything to do with literal meaning. For example, the 
 characters for 
 
 I touch flowers in vase 
 
 can mean 
 
 
 Final touch 


No problem with this. 

Bruno 



 
 Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 
 11/9/2012 
 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen 
 
 
 - Receiving the following content - 
 From: Bruno Marchal 
 Receiver: everything-list 
 Time: 2012-11-08, 10:36:49 
 Subject: Re: Peirce's concept of logical abduction-- a possible  
 moneymaker 
 
 
 Hi Roger Clough , 
 
 On 08 Nov 2012, at 11:03, Roger Clough wrote: 
 
 Hi Bruno Marchal 
 
 My principal interest over the years has been to 
 come up with some self-sustaining self-generating 
 method of autopoeisis. That's why I found the I Ching 
 fascinating. It contains sensible links between binary numbers and 
 metaphors. 
 
 When I look up methods of data mining, all they give is 
 hierarchy diagrams and numbers. How do they link 
 numbers and metaphors or words in general ? 
 Perhaps there is some sort of bayesian scheme to do that. 
 
 Roget's thesaurus might also be a starting point, 
 since they have words of similar meanings clustered, 
 but where you go from that beats me. 
 
 You should perhaps study how works a computer (or a universal number). 
 They transforms numbers into words and actions all the time, and this 
 in a non metaphorical way. And they can do much more, like referring 
 to themselves in the 3p but also in the 1p and other senses. There is 
 no more magic than in computer science, imo. 
 
 Bruno 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 
 11/8/2012 
 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen 
 
 
 - Receiving the following content - 
 From: Bruno Marchal 
 Receiver: everything-list 
 Time: 2012-11-07, 12:57:14 
 Subject: Re: Peirce's concept of logical abduction-- a possible 
 moneymaker 
 
 
 On 07 Nov 2012, at 18:12, Roger Clough wrote: 
 
 Hi Bruno Marchal 
 
 Cool. Shows you how little I know. 
 
 
 
 Those things are virtually unknown by most. Computer science is very 
 technical, and the number of publications is explosive, almost an 
 industry. It is also a gold mine, alas, most philosophy curriculum 
 does not have good courses in the field. We separate the human and  
 the 
 exact sciences, which does not help. 
 In science we still kill the diplomats, and this means that science  
 is 
 still run by unconscious (pseudo)-religion, if not simply the boss  
 is 
 right theory. Of course the degree of graveness is very variable in 
 time and places. 
 
 Bruno 
 
 
 
 
 Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 
 11/7/2012 
 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen 
 
 
 - Receiving the following content - 
 From: Bruno Marchal 
 Receiver: everything-list 
 Time: 2012-11-07, 12:05:11 
 Subject: Re: Peirce's concept of logical abduction-- a possible 
 moneymaker 
 
 
 
 
 Hi Roger Clough, 
 
 
 Hi Bruno Marchal 
 
 Yes, by new I mean contingent. But Kant, although his examples 
 are debatable, at least sought a synthetic a priori, 
 which of course would be a gold mine, or perhaps a stairway 
 to the divine. 
 
 Pragmatism rejects the idea of there being

Re: Re: How can words be transformed into numbers ?

2012-11-10 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Bruno Marchal  

The Devil is in the details,  and why bother with numbers
when you could use words ? 


Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 
11/10/2012  
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen 


- Receiving the following content -  
From: Bruno Marchal  
Receiver: everything-list  
Time: 2012-11-09, 14:26:09 
Subject: Re: How can words be transformed into numbers ? 


On 09 Nov 2012, at 13:41, Roger Clough wrote: 

 Hi Bruno Marchal 
 
 So how would 
 
 I see a cat. 
 
 be transformed into numbers ? 
 
 Maybe 63 7 89 ? 

I am afraid that will not be enough. I see a cat, to get put in  
number, with the 1-I and 3-I of you, you will need to scan your brain  
at the correct comp subst level (which exist by comp assumption), and  
this when you are looking at a cat. 
Then the real 1-I is not in that number, but in all the computation  
going through the state described by that number relatively to our  
most probable environment. The number can be used to reimplement you  
in some computer, and then you will be able to manifest your seeing a  
cat to us. 





 
 I could do that if I indexed all of the words in Roget's thesaurus, 
 but I don't think the numbers would mean anything besides numbers. 
 Because the meanings of words come from context -- not only in where 
 they are placed in a text but how they arose from culture. 
 Language is culture. 

You are right. 



 
 And in mandarin, three characters placed together might not 
 have anything to do with literal meaning. For example, the 
 characters for 
 
 I touch flowers in vase 
 
 can mean 
 
 
 Final touch 


No problem with this. 

Bruno 



 
 Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 
 11/9/2012 
 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen 
 
 
 - Receiving the following content - 
 From: Bruno Marchal 
 Receiver: everything-list 
 Time: 2012-11-08, 10:36:49 
 Subject: Re: Peirce's concept of logical abduction-- a possible  
 moneymaker 
 
 
 Hi Roger Clough , 
 
 On 08 Nov 2012, at 11:03, Roger Clough wrote: 
 
 Hi Bruno Marchal 
 
 My principal interest over the years has been to 
 come up with some self-sustaining self-generating 
 method of autopoeisis. That's why I found the I Ching 
 fascinating. It contains sensible links between binary numbers and 
 metaphors. 
 
 When I look up methods of data mining, all they give is 
 hierarchy diagrams and numbers. How do they link 
 numbers and metaphors or words in general ? 
 Perhaps there is some sort of bayesian scheme to do that. 
 
 Roget's thesaurus might also be a starting point, 
 since they have words of similar meanings clustered, 
 but where you go from that beats me. 
 
 You should perhaps study how works a computer (or a universal number). 
 They transforms numbers into words and actions all the time, and this 
 in a non metaphorical way. And they can do much more, like referring 
 to themselves in the 3p but also in the 1p and other senses. There is 
 no more magic than in computer science, imo. 
 
 Bruno 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 
 11/8/2012 
 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen 
 
 
 - Receiving the following content - 
 From: Bruno Marchal 
 Receiver: everything-list 
 Time: 2012-11-07, 12:57:14 
 Subject: Re: Peirce's concept of logical abduction-- a possible 
 moneymaker 
 
 
 On 07 Nov 2012, at 18:12, Roger Clough wrote: 
 
 Hi Bruno Marchal 
 
 Cool. Shows you how little I know. 
 
 
 
 Those things are virtually unknown by most. Computer science is very 
 technical, and the number of publications is explosive, almost an 
 industry. It is also a gold mine, alas, most philosophy curriculum 
 does not have good courses in the field. We separate the human and  
 the 
 exact sciences, which does not help. 
 In science we still kill the diplomats, and this means that science  
 is 
 still run by unconscious (pseudo)-religion, if not simply the boss  
 is 
 right theory. Of course the degree of graveness is very variable in 
 time and places. 
 
 Bruno 
 
 
 
 
 Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 
 11/7/2012 
 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen 
 
 
 - Receiving the following content - 
 From: Bruno Marchal 
 Receiver: everything-list 
 Time: 2012-11-07, 12:05:11 
 Subject: Re: Peirce's concept of logical abduction-- a possible 
 moneymaker 
 
 
 
 
 Hi Roger Clough, 
 
 
 Hi Bruno Marchal 
 
 Yes, by new I mean contingent. But Kant, although his examples 
 are debatable, at least sought a synthetic a priori, 
 which of course would be a gold mine, or perhaps a stairway 
 to the divine. 
 
 Pragmatism rejects the idea of there being any 
 such universals, but I think by abduction strives 
 to obtain completly new results (if actually new I can't say). 
 I think that's why Peirce came up with the concept of abduction. 
 The concept is very seductive to me for its possible 
 power of discovery of something unknown or new. 
 If comp could do